Must Read...Lessons on The Matrix

when you know something is wrong....

Feb 13, 2025

Date 12 February 2025.

Time 8:17 PM

I’ve come to recognise there are 4 classes of people when it comes to “conspiracy theories”.

Those that dismiss conspiracy theories as utter nonsense and stand firm. The very “absurdity” of the claim is dismissed with a “don’t waste my time on such nonsense”. They suffer from cognitive dissonance.
Those that learn of the alleged conspiracy theory and turn their attention to confirming or denying through research and their own critical thinking. They want to know the truth. They uncover the truth, but don’t act on it.
Those that have confirmed the “conspiracy theory” as fact, and are so confronted by the propaganda and lies it becomes a springboard for investigating other “conspiracy theories” to determine if other “conspiracy theories” hold any truth. They are the “truth seekers”. They want to know the “whole truth”.
Those that KNOW the conspiracy theory is factual, yet continue to perpetuate the lie through misinformation, disinformation, propaganda, and outright suppression tactics. These people are the liars. The ones that gain power by continuing the lies. They are the psychopaths.

Is it a conspiracy theory about the “validity” of the AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT? Maybe you’ve heard whispers that the AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT has usurped our 1901 Constitution? Maybe you’ve heard that they are a “foreign power”? Maybe you’ve heard that they are nothing more than a “for-profit” corporation feathering their own nests? Maybe you’ve heard that they are perpetuating a slavery system?... just a few “conspiracy theories that are tossed around.

Long-term readers of Off Grid in the Matrix may recall that I did a deep dive into “law” for about six years. I haven’t completely given my law studies away… I just got to the stage where I felt “I know enough!”

It all started with the Strawman conspiracy and the Birth Certificate. I suggest you take time (about 5 minutes) to get a handle on what the Strawman is. It’s the foundation of the “conspiracy theory”.

In full disclosure here is what Wikipedia has to say about the Strawman (click here)
There is a lot that can be said about this page and the “half truths”. There is plenty more behind the strawman.

Back around 2013 I was participating in a law group on Facebook where a core group of participants were researching and discussing the concept of the Strawman. Most of the discussion seemed to centre around those who wanted to “get out of fines” and had elected to take the matter to court using their newfound knowledge of the Strawman. I had my own day in court dealing when an unjust penalty. I’ll add here that I was probably one of the very few who actually had the matter “remedied” by not having to pay the fine. But it was a hell of an ordeal to which I devoted a lot of time and effort. For me it was a matter of principle - but if I had plenty of money I wouldn’t be bothered to do it - not now when I know so much more about the game that is being played I would never need to enter a court.

It goes without saying that I can’t condense all those years of legal research into a 15 minute post, however I was firmly convinced after my research that the Strawman indeed was joined to us as our legal persona and has been instigated to perpetuate a slavery system. EVERYTHING becomes clear when you know the FULL story.

I was studying the Australian legal system for upwards to 10 hours a day. I branched off into tort law, trust law, corporations Law, administrative Law, contract law, and familiarising myself with Supreme Court cases like “the Boilermakers Case (1956)”, “Sue V Hill”, “Mabo”…

I was reading lectures given by prominent judges like The Rule of Law series by CJ (Chief Justice) Murray Gleeson… Law Reform reports… Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, Rules of the Court… old legal text such as “ The Courts of Wards and Livery”.

I listened to hundreds of podcasts and watched just as many YouTube videos from people like Anna Von Rietz, Romley Stewart (the Justinian Deception) and his videos here, Frank O’Collins (here’s one of his videos I recommend), Karl Lentz, just to name a few incredibly knowledgeable people!

All of these individuals had already ventured down the rabbit hole and were presenting their evidence of what really amounts to how we have all been enslaved. The extent of the deception is mind-boggling. I would suggest that most people wouldn’t have the time or the inclination to put their head into law to understand how it was done. But done it has been… and it goes back a long time – well before Australia was settled. In fact, it’s been going on for so long that one could say that Earth has always been a slave colony.

It’s a big club and we’re not in it, and I have no doubt that today, the information taught to gain a law degree and become a solicitor, continues the deception. I consider if there is not full disclosure what we are getting into that is deception tactics.

Does that mean most lawyers have no clue as to the deception? Likely (and they will vehemently tell you it is all BS conspiracy theory)- but the further up the ladder you go the less chance they wouldn’t know. And it’s my opinion that anybody dealing in constructing legislation KNOWS they are perpetuating a slavery system.

Remember - my studies started back in 2013 - and I have no doubt that the uncovering of the deception has been around for a lot longer than the last 12 years! I know for a fact that many good people who were stellar researchers went to jail for their efforts. Men like Julian Assange and Dean Clifford. Now we can add Reiner Fuelmich (a top notch lawyer) who proved the Covid-19 pandemic was a scam of monumental proportions- now confirmed by thousands of others. Well worth a read - For an update by Reiner who is seriously copping the anger of the “elotes” for his disclosure.

Truth Summit

IN HIS OWN WORDS. UPDATE FROM REINER.

I believe we’ve all been waiting for this. An update from Reiner. (From Bittel tv…

a year ago · 181 likes · 32 comments · Elsa

Just recently I watched a short video clip from Julian Assange stating his confirmation that Australia is now part of the USA and there is absolutely no point appealing for changes from the AU government.

It didn’t surprise me.

It’s well known that the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA is listed on the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission), and registered in the US - as a corporation - which in itself is “kosher” - it merely being a requirement when dealing in international trade. It’s a corporation! It is an “entity” - something which is without life.

Is a Maxim of Law - No two things unlike can be joined! A living being (you) cannot be joined with an entity (a thing) which has no life! Unless by consent.

Take note of the way the following is written!

Jayne Mary Doe is a living being.

THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT ….is an entity.
JAYNE MARY DOE (THE “ALL CAPS” STRAWMAN NAME)… is an entity.

Jayne Mary Doe was born on a specific date and every year on that date she celebrates her birthday.

The ALL CAPS STRAWMAN was born on the day her birth was registered by the “informant”.

The interesting thing that I realised about law is that it is very precise, and much hinges on the definitions of words.

I know this sounds nerdy but I have two legal dictionaries and I find absolutely fascinating to read the definitions. But one must remember how law is given power is defined by how terms are defined in the definitions - which is the reason why Acts and Statues have their own definitions, and you can’t make sense of any acts or statutes unless you read the definitions first (and many definitions are pure gobbledy gook!).

I know for a fact that definitions continually change. Testimony for this is the number of legal dictionaries that are continually updated by the legal profession to suit their aims.

Is it any wonder that many high-ranking politicians come from a legal background?

However unfortunately, many of those elected into the Lower House of parliament have very little legal knowledge, and even less known is the history of our legal system.

I don’t believe that as laypersons we’ve ALL got it “wrong” - that there is nothing nefarious about our government and how they’re administrating our taxes. There are some brilliant minds who have researched how the deception has taken place, and I don’t believe you need to have a law degree to be able to read and understand legal documents or their jargon (legalese). However, you do need to have a solid comprehension of the meaning of certain words like registration and Informant to understand what registering a birth actually implies.

One also has to understand something called “Dog Latin” - which really is debased English where words are all in upper case text. Think back to your English lessons… Were you taught to write your name in all capitals? No. It pays to know what is begind Dag Latin. Great article by Romley Stewart to read here.

By the way… Romley is an Aussie. :-)

The truth is we’ve all become so accustomed to seeing words written in all uppercase that we consider it proper English. It is not. Is John Doe the same as JOHN DOE?
NO.

As it happened just recently I was at a book sale in my local town. I’d met the older gentleman that owned this repository of thousands of books - but only recently found out he had died and the new owner who purchased the building with all the books needed to start moving some of the stock. To put it in perspective, I’d say Dymock’s in George Street, Sydney (which has two levels), would probably only have one tenth of the number of books that were in this “shop”.

I spent a few hours there (but could have easily spent all day), and happened to pick up a book titled “STYLE MANUAL for authors, editors and printers (of Australian government Publications) ” (third edition). * First published in 1966 © Commonwealth of Australia 1978.

The Aussie version of the Chicago Styles Manual

I couldn’t believe my luck! – and only $2!

Much of the deception is centered around the use of uppercase text. This was brought to my attention by I believe Romley Stewart (an Australian), who had his own copy of the Chicago Styles Manual.

Of course the first thing I wanted to do was see what references were made to support (or deny), uppercase syntax in government publications. It was in this publication I had proof of debased English being used in Government documents.

Note: Reproduced verbatim as detailed in the Manual.

Chapter 3
Capitals (*pages 14-21)
Authors, editors and printers often worry unnecessarily about the use of capitals. On some points current usage may be confused, but on most the answer is straightforward, for there are clear rules to be followed. The underlying principle is the capitals are given to specific and proper names to distinguish them from general and common names.
Names and titles of people and institutions
Capitals should always be use for the names and titles of specific persons, institutions and the like. Thus:
Alfred Deacon the Speaker the Treasury
Sir John Stainer the Attorney-General the Stock Exchange
Lord Reith the Earl Marshal the Royal Navy
Admiral Nelson the Pope the Salvation Army
Father Brown the Vice-Chancellor the Academy of Science
Names of places
Capital initials should always be used for place names, whether the reference is iterative all real, and for political and geographical divisions
Thus:
South Australia the Australian Capital Territory
Queanbeyan the Blue Mountains
Southeast Asia the Red Sea
North America the Central Pacific Islands
Kingdom Come the Zoo
Utopia Lilliput

But note that this applies only when the reference is specific. Thus:
The blue mountains in the distance are not the Blue Mountains.
Typographical uses of capitals
The modern habit of using capitals sparingly is commendable. Too many capitals spoil the appearance of the printed page, and an unwelcome air of pretentiousness comes into government publications when common nouns such as department, committee, board and regulations, and adjectives such as departmental, parliamentary, statutory and ministerial are unnecessarily given initial capitals.

Capitals and small capitals, with or without capital initials, are often used for the displayed type in books; for example, on the jacket, the title-page, chapter titles and running headlines. They are also used in jobbing printing for such items as posters, stationery, and advertisements.
Words or phrases may sometimes be set entirely in capitals or small capitals to give special emphasis:
The warning POISON was clearly printed on the label.
Shipments of citrus fruits from Australia to New Zealand must be endorsed THE FRUIT IS FREE FROM LIVING SCALE INSECTS.

Headings
The indiscriminate use of initial capitals in headings should be avoided. No problem arises when a heading is set entirely in capitals or in even small capitals, but when capitals and lower case, all capitals and small capitals, are used, the printer needs to be told which initial letters are to be set in capitals. If such instructions are not given he may use initial capitals where they are not required. At one time, the rule was the initial capitals should be used for nouns only. For example:
DESIGN IN THE BOOKSHOP
Minister visits Newcastle and opens Clinic.

As you can see the style manual is not advocating (in the main) for all uppercase text, and more importantly never for an individuals name, or place name.

And yet… Go and have a look at the driver license. A council rates notice. A birth certificate. In fact, you will find that any correspondence or documentation from the Australian government is loaded with all uppercase text.

That’s the STRAWMAN. The legal fiction.

That’s the (dead) legal fiction which is being administered by another nonliving (dead) entity.

There is no jurisdiction over a living being without consent.

“Consent makes the law”.

Human beings have unlimited rights to contract. We can do business with whomever we choose, whenever we choose (or not).

What is a contract?
A contract is an agreement made between two or more parties that is intended to be legally enforceable. A contract arises when one party makes an offer and the other party communicates acceptance of that offer.
Contracts can be in writing or made orally and can be entered into in a variety of ways, including:
• signing a document
• agreeing over the phone
• clicking an ‘I agree’ button on a web page
• starting to act in accordance with the contract, having communicated acceptance of the terms of the contract to the other party.

For a contract to be considered valid (and this goes for all contracts - express (in writing) and implied (by action), ALL of these elements MUST be met:

1. The parties are of sound mind and of legal age.
2. The terms are certain (full disclosure of all terms and conditions)
3. The terms and conditions do not unduly favour one party over the other.
4. There is adequate time for consideration of the agreement.
5. No undue coercion.
6. There is a “wet ink” signature to the contract (although these days a mere click of the “I agree” button will suffice as a “signature” BY BOTH PARTIES).

To finish off I just want to add a word of caution about clicking “I agree” buttons on websites without reading the privacy policy, or the terms of service. Suffice to say if you actually read the terms of service and privacy policy of Facebook (Meta), you wouldn’t engage with it EVER.

And herein lies a massive problem when one is compelled to use various websites or Apps.

I wrote to the Department of Foreign Affairs when I was applying for a passport online. After reading the preamble, there was a checkbox for agreement, and a link to the privacy policy and terms of service. Clicking the links to read them I went to a blank page.

So there you have it. I wonder how many people proceeded without realising there was no way for them to review the privacy policy or terms of service.

And if that doesn’t alarm you, my Internet service provider has a terms of service that is 46 pages long!

It’s not the end of the strawman story. The recent (8^th February 2025) Grand Jury indictment for the criminality of the AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT has commenced.

It’s no conspiracy theory.

Off Grid in the Matrix… Gotta love it! (and steering clear of despicable adhesion contracts!)

Off Grid in the Matrix

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?